Site icon Bernard Aybout's Blog – MiltonMarketing.com

BYD’s New Super e-Platform Enables 1 MW EV Charging – A Technical Deep Dive

Bernard Aybout (Virii8)
BYD Super e-Platform

BYD Super e-Platform

BYD (Build Your Dreams) has unveiled a groundbreaking “Super e-Platform” for electric vehicles (EVs) that promises charging speeds on par with a gasoline fill-up. This new platform operates at 1,000 volts (V) and up to 1,000 amps (A), enabling 1,000 kW (1 megawatt) charging power – roughly double to triple the power of today’s fastest public chargers (BYD’s 1,000V Super E-Platform offers charging 400km in 5 minutes) (BYD Unveils Super e-Platform with ‘Flash-Charge Battery’). Under ideal conditions, a compatible EV can add ~400 km (249 miles) of range in just 5 minutes of charging (BYD’s 1,000V Super E-Platform offers charging 400km in 5 minutes) (BYD Unveils Super e-Platform with ‘Flash-Charge Battery’). Such ultra-fast charging blurs the line between EV “refueling” and conventional gas stops, addressing one of the last arguments against EV adoption – charge time. This article dives into the technical enablers of BYD’s 1 MW charging platform, including its 1,000V electrical architecture and 1,000A current delivery, and examines the implications for battery thermal management, cooling, cable insulation, and connector design. We’ll also compare BYD’s technology to leading Western EV platforms – from Tesla’s Superchargers to Lucid’s 924V system and the heavy-duty Megawatt Charging System (MCS) for trucks – and discuss whether such megawatt charging is scalable beyond China’s borders, considering infrastructure and safety.

BYD Super e-Platform

BYD Super e-Platform

(BYD’s 1,000V Super E-Platform offers charging 400km in 5 minutes) BYD’s new “flash-charge” battery platform claims: 1000 V high-voltage, 1000 A high-current, 10C charge rate, 1 MW power – enabling 400 km in 5 minutes and even 2 km of range per second under peak conditions (BYD’s 1,000V Super E-Platform offers charging 400km in 5 minutes) (BYD Unveils Super e-Platform with ‘Flash-Charge Battery’).

BYD’s 1,000V/1,000A Super e-Platform Explained

BYD’s Super e-Platform is an electric propulsion architecture centered on the latest evolution of BYD’s Blade battery (lithium iron phosphate, LFP) and new high-power electronics. Officially unveiled in Shenzhen on March 17, 2025, the platform supports an unprecedented 1,000 V battery system voltage and 1,000 A peak current, delivering 1,000 kW of charging power in burst mode (BYD’s 1,000V Super E-Platform offers charging 400km in 5 minutes) (BYD’s 1,000V Super E-Platform offers charging 400km in 5 minutes). In practical terms, BYD touts that this enables “flash charging” – adding ~400 km of driving range in 5 minutes (roughly 80 km per minute), or about “1 second for 2 kilometers” at the extreme peak (BYD’s 1,000V Super E-Platform offers charging 400km in 5 minutes) (BYD’s 1,000V Super E-Platform offers charging 400km in 5 minutes). Such performance represents a 10C charge rate, meaning the battery can charge at 10 times its capacity (per hour) – theoretically a full charge in ~6 minutes (BYD Unveils Super e-Platform with ‘Flash-Charge Battery’). For context, most modern EVs charge at 2–4C at best, and even other high-voltage platforms (like Porsche’s or Lucid’s) have peaked around 3–5C. BYD’s achievement breaks through the informal 800V ceiling that dominated EVs in recent years (BYD’s 1,000V Super E-Platform offers charging 400km in 5 minutes), entering what the company calls the “kilovolt era” (Woah, BYD’s ‘megawatt’ EV charging system cuts re-juicing to five minutes | Top Gear).

Battery Innovation – 10C LFP Cells with Reduced Internal Resistance: Achieving 1 MW charging in a passenger car requires a battery chemistry and design that can safely accept and dissipate enormous power without damage. BYD has not disclosed the exact kWh capacity of the new pack yet (BYD Unveils Super e-Platform with ‘Flash-Charge Battery’), but it has revealed key metrics: the pack is designed for 10C charging and discharging, and its internal resistance has been cut by 50% compared to previous cells (Woah, BYD’s ‘megawatt’ EV charging system cuts re-juicing to five minutes | Top Gear) (Woah, BYD’s ‘megawatt’ EV charging system cuts re-juicing to five minutes | Top Gear). Reducing internal resistance is critical because as a battery charges, internal resistance causes heat generation and limits how fast current can flow – it’s one reason charging typically tapers off at high state-of-charge. BYD claims an “ultra-high-speed ion channel from the anode to the cathode” in its new cell design, which likely refers to optimized electrode materials or electrolytes that facilitate faster ion transport (Woah, BYD’s ‘megawatt’ EV charging system cuts re-juicing to five minutes | Top Gear). By halving internal resistance, the cells can accept higher current with less voltage drop and heat, maintaining high power throughput even as the battery fills up (Woah, BYD’s ‘megawatt’ EV charging system cuts re-juicing to five minutes | Top Gear). In testing, BYD says the pack could still pull 600 kW at 90% charge – an astounding figure, as most EVs sharply taper down by 80% SOC (BYD Unveils Super e-Platform with ‘Flash-Charge Battery’). This suggests a very flat charging curve and excellent thermal management.

New Silicon-Carbide Power Electronics: Supporting the 1000V system are next-gen power semiconductors. BYD has developed new silicon carbide (SiC) microchips rated up to 1500V to handle the high voltage and high current safely (BYD Unveils Super e-Platform with ‘Flash-Charge Battery’). SiC MOSFETs in the drivetrain (inverters, DC/DC converters, onboard charger) switch more efficiently at high voltage than traditional silicon, reducing losses and heat. A three-core electrical system architecture was mentioned, implying BYD may have re-architected the power distribution and charging circuitry for this high power (possibly separate parallel paths for such high current) (Woah, BYD’s ‘megawatt’ EV charging system cuts re-juicing to five minutes | Top Gear). The use of a 1,500V-capable component envelope also provides a safety margin beyond the 1000V nominal, which is important for reliability and regulatory compliance.

High-Revving Electric Motors: While charging is the headline, BYD’s platform also ushers in new motors to utilize the high-voltage power. The company unveiled an in-house dual-motor drivetrain producing up to 810 kW (1,084 hp) combined (BYD Unveils Super e-Platform with ‘Flash-Charge Battery’) (BYD Unveils Super e-Platform with ‘Flash-Charge Battery’). A primary rear motor spins at 30,500 rpm, delivering ~778 hp, paired with a ~308 hp front motor for all-wheel drive (BYD Unveils Super e-Platform with ‘Flash-Charge Battery’). This makes the BYD Han L and Tang L (the first cars on the platform) some of the most powerful EVs on the market. The 1,000V bus allows these motors to draw more power without excessive current – keeping motor and inverter currents lower for a given power, which improves efficiency and reduces heat in the drivetrain wiring. BYD’s promotional material even likened the power headroom to Formula E levels, as shown during the launch event (New BYD electric car platform brings 1000kW charging, 1084bhp | Autocar). In effect, the Super e-Platform is not just about faster charging but also about delivering ultra-high performance efficiently, leveraging the high-voltage architecture for both charging and driving.

5-Minute Charging and Thermal Management Challenges

Delivering 1 megawatt into a car battery is an extreme engineering challenge, especially in terms of thermal management. At 1 MW, even a 95% efficient charging system would produce 50 kW of waste heat across the battery and electronics – equivalent to running dozens of home space heaters simultaneously. BYD’s system thus employs robust cooling at multiple levels:

  • Battery Pack Cooling: The Blade LFP battery likely uses advanced liquid cooling channels to extract heat from cells rapidly during fast charge. The high charge rate (10C) would otherwise overheat cells, leading to degradation or safety issues. BYD has not given specifics, but the “ultra-fast ion” chemistry and lowered resistance suggest the cells are optimized to minimize heat generation (Woah, BYD’s ‘megawatt’ EV charging system cuts re-juicing to five minutes | Top Gear). Still, actively cooling the pack is essential. We can expect large coolant flow rates and perhaps cooling plates between cell modules or even immersion cooling. Maintaining uniform cell temperature is critical to avoid localized stress when charging 1000A. BYD’s experience with Blade batteries (known for thermal stability and no thermal runaway propagation) is a plus here – the long, thin Blade cell format can help expose more surface area to cooling interfaces.
  • Charging Cable and Connector Cooling: To handle 1,000A of current, the charging cable and connector are almost certainly liquid-cooled. High-power DC fast chargers today (350 kW units) use coolant in the cables to keep them flexible and safe to handle; at 1000A, cooling is even more critical. A member of the EV community noted that 1,000 A through a copper conductor would normally require an impractically thick cable – potentially “hundreds of pounds” of copper to carry that current continuously (BYD’s New ‘Megawatt’ EV Charging Is So Fast It Makes Gas Irrelevant : r/technews). However, by using active cooling and high-quality materials, BYD can use a pair of large conductors (on the order of 2 × 100 mm^2 cross-section) for plus and minus. One engineer calculated that a ~5 m long cable with two 100 mm^2 copper cores would contain ~9 kg of copper, which with insulation and coolant jackets might weigh on the order of ~20 kg (44 lbs) – heavy but manageable for a stationary charging hose (BYD’s New ‘Megawatt’ EV Charging Is So Fast It Makes Gas Irrelevant : r/technews). The cable likely has a refrigeration unit to keep it cool during 1000A operation. By comparison, the upcoming Megawatt Charging System (MCS) cables for trucks (which handle 3000A) are also liquid-cooled and designed to be either automated or assistively handled due to their weight.
  • Connector Design and Insulation: The charge connector must safely carry 1000V and 1000A without excessive heating or arcing. This requires excellent contact engineering – large surface-area pins or multiple pins in parallel, spring-loaded pressure to ensure low contact resistance, and materials that resist corrosion or pitting under repeated high-power cycles. The insulation and seals need to withstand >1 kV DC without breakdown, even in harsh weather. It’s likely that BYD’s system builds on the new ChaoJi (China’s CHAdeMO 3.0) connector standard, which is rated up to 1500V and 600A (900 kW) (Electric Heavy-Duty Vehicle Infrastructure: Regional Leaders and Growth Markets). BYD may have augmented this or developed a proprietary connector to push to 1000A. Safety interlocks would ensure no power flows until the connector is properly seated and locked. At these currents, even milliohms of resistance at the contact points can cause significant heating, so expect elaborate cooling even within the connector handle (some designs circulate coolant right up to the pins). Dielectric strength of cables and connectors is another concern – 1000V is above the usual ELV (extra-low-voltage) threshold, meaning servicemen and users must treat it with the same caution as high-voltage industrial equipment.
  • Onboard Thermal Management: The vehicle itself must coordinate with the charger to manage battery temperatures. Likely, before a planned fast charge, the car will pre-cool or pre-heat the battery to the optimal temperature (Tesla does something similar with “On-Route Battery Warmup” for Supercharging (Introducing V3 Supercharging | Tesla)). During the 5-minute charge blast, the car’s coolant loop might run at full tilt, possibly engaging chillers or refrigerant-based cooling if available. BYD hasn’t detailed if the new models have any novel cooling techniques (such as two-phase cooling or refrigerant cooling directly in the pack), but given the ambition, they may have increased the cooling system capacity (bigger radiators, pumps, etc.).

In summary, heat is a major bottleneck for ultra-fast charging. BYD’s approach appears to tackle it via improved cell chemistry (less heat generation) and heavy-duty cooling for the pack and charging hardware. As Top Gear quipped, you couldn’t just “plug in your old Nissan Leaf and hope for the best” at 1 MW – its battery and cables would melt (Woah, BYD’s ‘megawatt’ EV charging system cuts re-juicing to five minutes | Top Gear). BYD’s system is a holistic redesign to handle the thermal and electrical stress of megawatt-level charging.

Cable, Connector, and Safety Considerations at 1,000A

Handling 1,000A is not just a thermal issue but also a mechanical and safety challenge. High-current cables are thick and stiff; high-voltage connectors can arc dangerously if disconnected under load. Here’s how BYD and the industry at large mitigate these issues:

  • Cable Management and Automation: Because a liquid-cooled 1 MW charging cable will be relatively heavy and thick, station designers might employ pulleys or spring balancers to take the weight off the user. There’s speculation that automated connectors or robotic charging arms could be used in the future – for example, a mechanism that automatically docks the cable to the car’s inlet, relieving drivers from wrestling with a 20-30 kg cable. For passenger cars like the BYD Han L, the initial approach is likely a manual plug (with cooling and ergonomic design), but if megawatt charging becomes common, automation is a logical step (indeed, some MCS concepts for trucks assume an automated coupling due to the even larger cable).
  • Avoiding Arcs and Contact Wear: At 1000V DC, any disconnection under load could create a dangerous arc. The charging protocol will ensure current is zero before mechanical release (via communication between car and charger to stop power flow). Connectors have pilot signals and interlocks to manage this. The pins themselves might be designed to engage/disengage in stages, or use sacrificial contacts for any arcing. Insulation monitoring is also critical – the system likely continuously checks for isolation faults (any unintended current path to ground) and will shut down if a fault is detected, to prevent shocks. The connector likely includes temperature sensors at the contacts – if a pin starts to overheat (due to wear or dirt causing resistance), the charger can ramp down current to prevent failure. These safety measures are part of existing fast-charge standards (CCS and ChaoJi) and would be even more stringent at 1000A.
  • Standards and Certification: Outside China, the CCS (Combined Charging System) standard is most common for DC fast charging. CCS1 (North America) and CCS2 (Europe) connectors are typically rated up to 500A continuous (with liquid cooling) and ~1000V, for about 350-500 kW max today. BYD’s 1000A exceeds current CCS specs. It might require an updated standard or a different connector (perhaps the MCS connector or a variant). ChaoJi in China is an evolving standard aiming for 900 kW and beyond (Electric Heavy-Duty Vehicle Infrastructure: Regional Leaders and Growth Markets), so BYD’s tech might be implemented as an extension of that for the Chinese market. Any deployment of 1 MW chargers outside China would need approval by local authorities (e.g., UL certification in the US, CE in Europe). Regulatory hurdles include ensuring the grid connection for such chargers meets electrical codes and that proper safety mechanisms (ground fault detection, emergency shut-offs, etc.) are in place.
  • Human Safety and Training: From a user standpoint, a 1000V/1000A charger should be as safe to use as a lower-power one, provided all interlocks work. Users will mostly just connect a plug – they won’t directly encounter the voltage or current. However, technicians installing or servicing these units will require high-voltage training. First responders, too, might need awareness – though EVs already carry ~400-800V batteries, a 1000V system raises the stakes slightly in accidents. One interesting point raised in the EV community was the magnetic and inductive effects of such high current – a 1000A DC current produces a strong magnetic field. If it were AC, the changing field could induce currents in nearby metal (even a watch on your wrist), but since it’s DC, the field is static when current is steady (BYD’s New ‘Megawatt’ EV Charging Is So Fast It Makes Gas Irrelevant : r/technews) (BYD’s New ‘Megawatt’ EV Charging Is So Fast It Makes Gas Irrelevant : r/technews). So, standing near a 1 MW DC cable won’t induce currents in objects (no “magnetic frying” concerns, unlike an AC scenario). Nonetheless, maintaining distance from any high-power electrical connection is wise, and these stations will be built with robust enclosures and insulation to prevent accidental contact.

In short, BYD’s megawatt charging tech is pushing into new territory for cables and connectors, but draws heavily on known solutions from the high-power DC charging industry (like liquid cooling, interlocks, and upcoming standards like MCS and ChaoJi). As one engineering-minded commenter noted, the seemingly “crazy” 1000A current is within the realm of possibility – using ~150 mm² aluminum cables or ~100 mm² copper, and lots of cooling, one can deliver this power without the cable weighing “hundreds of pounds” (BYD’s New ‘Megawatt’ EV Charging Is So Fast It Makes Gas Irrelevant : r/technews) (BYD’s New ‘Megawatt’ EV Charging Is So Fast It Makes Gas Irrelevant : r/technews). BYD is effectively proving that megawatt charging is not just for trucks, but achievable in consumer EVs with careful engineering.

Performance of BYD’s Han L and Tang L on the Super e-Platform

The first production vehicles to feature the 1 MW Super e-Platform are the BYD Han L (a luxury sedan) and BYD Tang L (a large SUV), which were launched in China alongside the platform reveal (BYD’s 1,000V Super E-Platform offers charging 400km in 5 minutes). These models not only charge fast but also boast supercar-like performance thanks to the platform’s high-power drivetrain. Below are some top-line specs:

The launch of these models has been met with excitement from EV enthusiasts. One commenter noted how rapid the technology race has become, saying there was a time one particular EV maker (a likely nod to Tesla) was “years ahead” but now “they are overtaken left and right” (BYD’s 1,000V Super E-Platform offers charging 400km in 5 minutes). Indeed, BYD’s move has upped the ante. It’s a showcase that Chinese EV manufacturers are not just catching up to, but potentially surpassing Western rivals in certain tech metrics. The Han L and Tang L demonstrate that world-beating charging and performance can be achieved at (relatively) mass-market prices.

Comparing BYD’s 1MW Charging to Tesla, Lucid, and Industry Standards

BYD’s 1000V/1000A platform sets a new benchmark, but how does it stack up against the current and upcoming fast-charge technologies from other players? Let’s compare:

Tesla Supercharger Network (V3 vs. V4): Tesla’s Superchargers are the most extensive fast-charging network globally. V3 Superchargers, introduced in 2019, provide up to 250 kW per car (peaking around 410 V, 600 A for a Model 3). That translates to about 75 miles of range in 5 minutes for a Model 3 Long Range (Introducing V3 Supercharging | Tesla) – roughly one-third the speed of BYD’s claim (though Tesla’s estimate is at highway efficiency, whereas BYD’s 400 km/5 min is likely at a slower test-cycle efficiency). Tesla’s upcoming V4 Superchargers are expected to increase power. According to reports and Tesla statements, V4 cabinets will support up to 500 kW per stall for cars (New BYD electric car platform brings 1000kW charging, 1084bhp | Autocar), and even higher (possibly 1+ MW) for the Tesla Semi truck. In fact, Tesla has hinted at 1,000V architecture for its new chargers and vehicles like Cybertruck and Semi (Tesla’s first 500kW V4 Superchargers are coming next year) (Tesla announces all V4 Superchargers can now charge up to …). However, as of early 2025, deployed V4 stalls in Europe are still operating around 250 kW (likely awaiting vehicle and software updates to unlock higher rates). Even at 500 kW, Tesla’s car chargers would be half the power of BYD’s 1,000 kW. WardsAuto notes that 1 MW is “double the 500-kW peak power of Tesla’s latest V4 Supercharger” (BYD Unveils Super e-Platform with ‘Flash-Charge Battery’). The Tesla Semi, on the other hand, uses a Megacharger with around 750 kW to 1 MW power (PepsiCo’s Semi chargers reportedly operate at 750 kW). Tesla plans to integrate Semi charging at some V4 sites with a separate cable, supporting 1.2 MW for trucks (Tesla’s first 500kW V4 Superchargers are coming next year) – which aligns with emerging standards. In summary, Tesla’s consumer EV charging is still an order of magnitude behind BYD’s new platform; even the anticipated upgrades to ~500 kW will not reach BYD’s 1 MW for cars. Tesla’s focus, however, has been more on network coverage and reliability, whereas BYD is leapfrogging in raw power. It will be interesting to see if Tesla responds with higher-voltage architectures in future models (e.g., a Tesla Model 3 “Highland” with 800V has been rumored, which could take better advantage of 350+ kW stations).

Lucid Air’s 924V Architecture: Lucid Motors (USA) has one of the industry’s most advanced EV platforms in production. The Lucid Air sedan runs a 900+ V system (nominal ~924V) and can accept over 300 kW charging power (Watch The Lucid Air Grand Touring Add 200 Miles Of Range In 11 Minutes). In real-world tests at 350 kW chargers, the Lucid Air has demonstrated ~319 kW peak and added 200 miles in 11 minutes (Watch The Lucid Air Grand Touring Add 200 Miles Of Range In 11 Minutes) (Watch The Lucid Air Grand Touring Add 200 Miles Of Range In 11 Minutes). That makes Lucid one of the quickest-charging EVs in the West – but it’s still far shy of BYD’s 1000 kW. Lucid’s peak is limited by both the charger (350 kW stations) and the car’s own limit (~300 kW by spec). The Air’s 118 kWh battery charges from 0 to 80% in about 34 minutes in optimal conditions (Watch The Lucid Air Grand Touring Add 200 Miles Of Range In 11 Minutes) (Watch The Lucid Air Grand Touring Add 200 Miles Of Range In 11 Minutes). BYD’s promise, by contrast, would add ~80 kWh (assuming 5 min of 1000 kW minus tapering) in 5 minutes. Voltage vs. Current: Lucid’s advantage is running at nearly 1 kV, so for 300 kW it draws ~325 A. BYD runs at 1 kV but pushes the current up to 1000 A to get 1000 kW. This higher current is the bigger engineering challenge. It’s worth noting that Porsche/Audi’s 800V system can do ~270–350 kW (Porsche Taycan, Audi e-tron GT), and other 800V cars (Hyundai Ioniq 5, Kia EV6) do ~230 kW. So far, Lucid was the only one close to 350 kW. BYD has now tripled that figure. Lucid’s upcoming models (like the Gravity SUV) might incrementally improve charging (perhaps 350+ kW if paired with higher-power stations), but no automaker outside China has suggested going near 1 MW for a passenger EV yet. Lucid’s CEO Peter Rawlinson has emphasized efficiency (miles per kWh) as much as charging speed (Watch The Lucid Air Grand Touring Add 200 Miles Of Range In 11 Minutes) (Watch The Lucid Air Grand Touring Add 200 Miles Of Range In 11 Minutes) – a different philosophy where needing less energy for distance partly compensates for lower power. BYD seems to be brute-forcing the charging speed issue by simply pumping more kW.

Megawatt Charging System (MCS) for Heavy Transport: Outside of consumer cars, the MCS standard is being developed to charge electric trucks and buses with very large battery packs. MCS aims for 1 MW and above to allow, for example, a Class-8 semi truck to gain hundreds of miles during a mandated rest stop. The CharIN industry consortium officially unveiled the MCS prototype in 2022, showing a new connector design that can handle up to 3,000 A at ~1,250 V (approximately 3.75 MW) (The newly unveiled MCS connector looks a lot like a cross between CCS1 and the Tesla connector : r/electricvehicles) (The newly unveiled MCS connector looks a lot like a cross between CCS1 and the Tesla connector : r/electricvehicles). Initial implementations, however, will be around 1.2–1.5 MW (e.g., 1,500 A at 1,000 V) for early trucks. In fact, in mid-2023, ABB and Scania demonstrated a 1.2 MW charge into a Scania electric truck using an MCS prototype, the first of its kind (ABB E-mobility and Scania successfully undertake first test in …) (Scania tests ABB’s megawatt charging system for next-gen electric …). And in the US, a company called WattEV opened the country’s first public MCS charging station, with 1.2 MW chargers installed in California (Electric Heavy-Duty Vehicle Infrastructure: Regional Leaders and Growth Markets). These truck stops use the MCS connector, which is more industrial in size, and typically have big battery buffers and robust grid connections. The BYD 1MW platform for cars interestingly overlaps with MCS power levels. BYD essentially created an MCS-like capability but for a passenger vehicle context. However, the connector and format may differ (BYD likely uses an advanced car plug, whereas MCS is a larger separate design for trucks). It’s also notable that BYD itself is a major player in commercial EVs (buses, trucks) and is likely involved in MCS or similar projects. In China, there’s also a parallel standard to MCS called ChaoJi 3.0, aiming up to 900 kW for both cars and heavier vehicles (Electric Heavy-Duty Vehicle Infrastructure: Regional Leaders and Growth Markets) (Electric Heavy-Duty Vehicle Infrastructure: Regional Leaders and Growth Markets). BYD’s achievement overshoots ChaoJi too, suggesting they forged their own path to 1000 kW. The existence of MCS and its demos in Germany (e.g., the HoLa project is piloting MCS for long-haul trucks on German highways (CharIN e. V. officially launches the Megawatt Charging System (MCS) at EVS35 in Oslo, Norway – CharIN)) proves that megawatt charging is feasible with today’s tech, albeit with substantial infrastructure. BYD essentially brings that capability down to consumer level. The key difference: trucks have huge batteries (500+ kWh) so a 1.2 MW charge might give them ~400 km in 45 minutes, whereas BYD’s car has perhaps ~100 kWh and can get 400 km in 5 minutes – a much more intense power delivery into a smaller pack.

Summary Comparison Table: To illustrate the differences, below is a high-level comparison of charging architectures:

Charging System Max Voltage Max Current Peak Power Range Added in 5 min Notable Uses
BYD Super e-Platform (2025) 1000 V 1000 A 1000 kW (1.0 MW) ~249 miles (400 km)​
electrek.co
 BYD Han L, Tang L (China-only)
Tesla Supercharger V3 (2019) ~410 V (pack) ~600 A 250 kW​
tesla.com
 ~75 miles (121 km)​
tesla.com
 Most Tesla sites worldwide (current)
Tesla Supercharger V4 (2024+) ~1000 V (cabinet) ~?? A (est. 500–600 A) 350–500 kW (planned)​
autocar.co.uk
 ~150+ miles (240+ km) (with 500 kW) New Tesla sites (Europe, NA) – in rollout
Lucid / 800–900V EVs (2021+) 900 V+ ~350 A 300 kW​
insideevs.com
 ~120 miles (193 km)​
insideevs.com
 Lucid Air, Porsche Taycan, etc.
Megawatt Charging System (MCS) 1000–1250 V 1500–3000 A 1.2–3.0 MW​
reddit.com

​

statzon.com
 N/A (heavy trucks, varies) Electric semi-trucks (demo/trials)

Table: BYD’s 1 MW car charging compared to other fast-charge technologies. BYD’s leap to 1000 kW far exceeds existing car charging rates. Tesla’s upcoming V4 will raise car charging to ~500 kW in coming years, while Lucid and Porsche use high-voltage packs to achieve ~300 kW. The MCS is a standard for charging large trucks at megawatt levels (initially ~1–1.5 MW) (Electric Heavy-Duty Vehicle Infrastructure: Regional Leaders and Growth Markets). (BYD Unveils Super e-Platform with ‘Flash-Charge Battery’) (Watch The Lucid Air Grand Touring Add 200 Miles Of Range In 11 Minutes)

Scalability Outside China – Infrastructure and Regulatory Hurdles

While BYD’s 1 MW charging is a triumph of engineering, a key question is: Can this level of charging performance be realized outside of China in the near future? There are several factors to consider:

Grid Infrastructure: A 1 MW charger pulls as much power as a small substation. If multiple 1 MW chargers were installed at a station (say 4-6 in a highway rest stop), the site could demand 4–6 MW when busy – equivalent to powering a neighborhood. Many regions do not have such spare capacity readily available at every highway exit. Grid upgrades or local energy storage would be needed. In China, BYD plans to roll out over 4,000 ultra-fast charging stations across the country (BYD’s 1,000V Super E-Platform offers charging 400km in 5 minutes) (BYD Unveils Super e-Platform with ‘Flash-Charge Battery’), presumably focusing on major corridors and cities. The timeline is unclear, but given China’s rapid infrastructure development, BYD might deploy these in a few years. Outside China, however, utilities and permitting processes can slow things down. Western countries would need to invest in beefing up grid connections to service plazas. Alternatively, stations might use battery buffers – large on-site battery banks that charge slowly from the grid and then dump power quickly into cars. This can reduce the instantaneous grid draw (at the cost of complexity and some efficiency). Some existing fast stations (e.g., in the UK and US) use battery buffers to support 350 kW chargers where the grid is weak. At 1 MW, this approach could be even more critical. Renewable energy integration is another aspect: a 1 MW solar array (which is quite large, ~2-3 acres of panels) could theoretically supply one charger under full sun. In practice, solar/storage can help mitigate the grid impact but not fully support a continuous 1 MW draw for each EV.

Standards and Compatibility: As noted, China has its own charging standards (GB/T and evolving ChaoJi standard). BYD’s network in China will likely use a standard compatible with Chinese vehicles. If BYD wanted to implement this abroad, it might face compatibility issues with CCS. The CCS consortium would need to ratify higher power versions (beyond 500A) or adopt MCS for cars, which isn’t currently in scope. Regulatory bodies like SAE, IEC would have to standardize any new connector or increase limits on existing ones. This takes time – typically years of committees and testing. For instance, the MCS standard (SAE J3271) has been in development since 2018 and is expected to be published around 2024 (Electric Heavy-Duty Vehicle Infrastructure: Regional Leaders and Growth Markets). Car charging at 1 MW might require a new standard or extending MCS downward to cars. In the meantime, any pilot deployment would be proprietary and limited (e.g., only BYD’s own vehicles could use it, with special adapters). This lack of standardization could slow adoption outside China, where open standards are favored.

Safety and Certification: Different countries have electrical codes that might not yet accommodate such high-power automotive equipment. For example, in the US, UL certification would be needed for the charger units – UL may require additional safety features for 1000V equipment accessible to the public. Similarly, training first responders on dealing with 1000V EVs (in an accident scenario) might be addressed in regulations. However, since 800V cars are already out and 1000V industrial machines exist, the jump to 1000V in cars is not a radical legal leap – it’s more about ensuring everything is failsafe. Cooling system maintenance is another aspect: a 1 MW charger has more points of failure (pumps, coolant leaks, etc.). Station operators will need to maintain them diligently. In regions without dense BYD service networks, this could be a challenge initially.

Market Demand and Automaker Adoption: Will non-BYD vehicles adopt 1 MW charging? In China, other domestic automakers might follow BYD’s lead if the rollout is successful. In the West, companies might take a “wait and see” approach. Porsche/Audi are sticking with 800V ~350 kW for now; Tesla is moving to 500 kW; Lucid is ~300 kW. It might be a few years before a Western automaker designs a 1000V, 1000A-capable platform, perhaps due to perceived overkill or concerns about cost/complexity. If no cars can charge at 1 MW, there is little incentive to install such chargers. It becomes a chicken-and-egg issue. Charging alliances (like Ionity in Europe or Electrify America in the US) might be cautious to invest in >350 kW hardware without clear demand. However, the presence of the MCS for trucks could indirectly spur infrastructure: if truck stops and highway stations install 1–1.5 MW chargers for semis and buses, there’s a possibility to offer those to cars that can use them (with appropriate adapters or dual cables). For example, a future scenario could be a rest area having a few MCS chargers – a BYD or other megawatt-capable car could potentially charge from the same dispenser used for trucks, if standards allow handshake. This cross-use might require coordination, but technically if the voltage is in range and the connector fits (or there’s an adapter), a megawatt charger doesn’t care if it’s a 5-ton truck or a sedan on the other end.

Community and Expert Outlook: The EV community has reacted with a mix of awe and practical skepticism. Enthusiast sites like Electrek heralded BYD’s achievement as “breaking the ceiling” and showing a “glimpse into the future” where fast charging is no longer a barrier (BYD’s 1,000V Super E-Platform offers charging 400km in 5 minutes). Experts agree it’s a significant milestone: Electrek’s take called it a “momentous day for the EV industry” and applauded BYD for delivering “on paper” the best charging architecture in the world (BYD’s 1,000V Super E-Platform offers charging 400km in 5 minutes). On the other hand, some commenters caution that real-world use will be the proof. Can the battery maintain longevity with repeated 10C fast charges? How often will 1 MW be achievable (only at low states-of-charge and ideal temperatures, most likely)? There are also concerns about the size of infrastructure: “drawing down a humongous amount of energy from the grid… not dissimilar to all the kettles in England being switched on after Corrie (a TV show)” as Top Gear humorously noted (Woah, BYD’s ‘megawatt’ EV charging system cuts re-juicing to five minutes | Top Gear). This highlights the fear that widespread 1 MW charging could strain power grids if not managed. However, grid operators can mitigate spikes with smart charging (scheduling, buffering) and the fact that not every EV needs 1 MW – many will still trickle at lower rates due to battery limits or not needing a full blast for a small top-up.

In regulatory terms, China often moves faster in approving new tech like this, while North America and Europe may lag a bit. The HoLa project in Germany (a pilot for megawatt truck charging) will provide data on grid impact and station design for high power (CharIN e. V. officially launches the Megawatt Charging System (MCS) at EVS35 in Oslo, Norway – CharIN). Those findings could inform policies in Europe about installing megawatt chargers. If deemed feasible, Europe might greenlight mega-charging hubs by late this decade. The U.S. DOE and national labs are also studying extreme fast charging (XFC); 1 MW car charging could become part of those R&D efforts especially as they push EV adoption for all use-cases.

Scalability Verdict: BYD’s 1 MW charging is technologically scalable – meaning there’s no physical law preventing it from working elsewhere – but the ecosystem readiness varies. In China, BYD can build the whole vertical stack: vehicles, chargers, and likely even support from the state utility. Elsewhere, it will require coordination with charging providers and standards bodies. We may see limited deployments in select locations (for example, BYD might equip some of its showrooms or import markets with a megacharger to showcase the tech for premium clients). Widespread adoption, however, could take years. It will likely ride on the back of heavy-duty charging infrastructure – essentially piggybacking on the MCS rollout – unless the industry coalesces on a unified approach for cars.

One also must consider diminishing returns: 1 MW in 5 minutes is amazing, but if your EV can already get 80% in 15 minutes at 350 kW, the utility of 5-minute charging vs 15-minute charging may not be game-changing for all users, especially if it incurs higher costs. There might be niche use cases (taxis, emergency services, impatient travelers) that love 5-minute full charges, but others might be content with 15-20 minutes if it means less stress on the battery and infrastructure. Battery swapping is another competing idea for ultra-fast turnaround, though it has different challenges and has mostly been pursued by Nio in China.

In conclusion, BYD has thrown down a gauntlet with its Super e-Platform. It showcases that megawatt charging for EVs is not a far-off concept – it’s here, at least in one market, in 2025. The platform’s 1000V architecture and 1000A capability required innovation in battery design (high-C LFP cells, reduced resistance), thermal cooling, and power electronics. BYD’s achievement will likely spur a response: we can expect other automakers and charging companies to accelerate their high-voltage, high-power roadmaps. As one industry observer put it, “Impressive how fast things are evolving now… now [previous leaders] are overtaken left and right” (BYD’s 1,000V Super E-Platform offers charging 400km in 5 minutes). The race is on to make EV charging as quick and convenient as possible. With real-world trials and global collaboration (through efforts like CharIN’s MCS and China’s ChaoJi), it’s plausible that by late in this decade, 1 MW charging stations could start appearing along international highways, and not just for trucks but also for the latest high-end electric cars. BYD’s head start in China will provide valuable lessons in scaling the tech, managing safety, and integrating such colossal chargers into daily life. The rest of the world will be watching closely – and gearing up to catch up.

Sources:

Related Videos:

Bernard Aybouts - Blog - MiltonMarketing.com

Related Posts:

“Keep WiFi on during sleep” setting for Chromebooks

Pioneering the Future of Hybrid Mobility: (DHD) Duo Powertrain

Super Mario 63

Chinese Automakers Overtake U.S. Rivals: A Global Shift in the Automotive Industry

Chinese EV Outpaces U.S. Competition with Revolutionary Charging Speeds

Google investing $2.1m into kw programs supporting women in computer science, coding for youth

Exit mobile version