Approx. read time: 6.4 min.
Post: Is the Universe a Simulation? New Physics Theory Suggests Gravity Is a Byproduct of Information Processing
Introduction: A Glitch in the Cosmos?
For centuries, we’ve assumed that gravity is one of the fundamental forces of nature—a universal thread pulling objects toward one another. Yet, a radical theory now posits something very different: that gravity is not a force at all, but an emergent phenomenon arising from the universe functioning like a vast computational system. Published in AIP Advances, this theory suggests we may be living in something akin to a computer simulation.
At the heart of this new model is the idea that gravity is the result of information compression, governed by a new physical principle—the Second Law of Infodynamics. This challenges long-held beliefs and opens a new avenue in theoretical physics that may redefine our very understanding of reality.
Understanding Information as a Fundamental Force
From Thermodynamics to Infodynamics
The second law of thermodynamics, which states that entropy (disorder) always increases in a closed system, is a bedrock of classical physics. In contrast, the second law of infodynamics proposed by the study suggests that informational entropy must decrease or stay static within a closed information system. Rather than promoting chaos, information seeks order.
Coffee and the Cosmic Message
Imagine a steaming cup of coffee cooling on your desk. Over time, it reaches thermal equilibrium with the room: energy dissipates, molecular activity slows, and entropy peaks. But from an information theory perspective, this is precisely the opposite. As temperature evens out, all molecules begin to behave identically—the diversity of energy states vanishes. The message becomes simpler, more compressed.
This principle echoes how computers operate. They compress and organize data to optimize processing. Could the universe be doing the same with the matter and energy it governs?
Informational Gravity: A New Perspective on Attraction
Gravity as a Computational Shortcut
Under this new framework, gravity is not a force in the traditional sense. Instead, it’s a byproduct of the universe’s tendency to compress information. When matter is scattered, the informational complexity is high. But when it clumps together—as stars, planets, and galaxies do—complexity decreases, and the system becomes easier to compute.
In other words, the so-called gravitational pull may simply be the universe “optimizing” its data structure, drawing matter together not through invisible lines of force but to reduce the informational cost of storing it.
The Cellular Fabric of Reality
In this model, space itself is not continuous. It is composed of discrete “cells” of information—akin to pixels on a digital screen. Each of these cells holds fundamental data, such as particle position, velocity, or energy state. When more items populate this grid, the complexity (and thus the computational load) increases. When they merge, simplicity and efficiency return.
If correct, this structure redefines our conception of the universe from being a smooth, analog realm to a digital, pixelated reality—with gravity as a software function.
The Second Law of Infodynamics in Action
What Is Informational Entropy?
In classical information theory, entropy measures the uncertainty or diversity of data in a system. Claude Shannon, the father of information theory, showed that the more unpredictable a system is, the higher its entropy.
The second law of infodynamics inverts this principle within the context of universal information. Instead of rising entropy as in thermodynamics, the informational entropy of the universe tends to decrease, seeking ordered and low-complexity configurations.
Matching Newton’s Law
Astoundingly, the entropic “informational force” resulting from this minimization of entropy mathematically mirrors Newton’s law of gravitation. That is, the apparent attraction between masses can be derived as a side-effect of information compression, not a primary force of nature. This reframes gravity as a logical outcome of information laws, not a standalone force.
Precedents in Physics: Entropic Gravity and Beyond
The idea of entropic gravity is not entirely new. Nobel laureate Erik Verlinde previously proposed that gravity might emerge from entropy changes. However, this new theory takes things a step further, showing that these entropy shifts are informational rather than thermodynamic.
Other supporting fields include:
- Digital Physics: Postulates that the universe can be described in terms of information processing.
- Quantum Information Theory: Suggests that quantum states encode information, aligning with the idea of a computational universe.
- Holographic Principle: Implies that all the information within a volume of space can be represented on its boundary, a form of data compression in cosmic proportions.
If the Universe Is a Simulation, What Are the Implications?
A Designed Cosmos?
If gravity and other natural laws are emergent properties of computational processes, this raises the provocative question: Is the universe a designed simulation?
In this view, our cosmos might operate under cosmic software, optimized for efficiency, symmetry, and informational elegance. Like a video game world governed by consistent physics engines, our universe might be run by a master algorithm. Quantum mechanics, relativity, and even chaos might simply be outputs of a highly advanced operating system.
Testing the Hypothesis
While direct evidence of a simulation remains elusive, some physicists have proposed possible avenues for testing:
- Pixelated Space: Looking for limits to resolution in spacetime that would suggest a discrete structure.
- Anomalies in Cosmic Rays: Searching for artifacts in high-energy cosmic radiation that suggest rendering limits.
- Simulated Symmetries: Testing whether laws of physics reflect optimization or shortcut logic.
While none are definitive, these tests could inch us closer to verifying the computational nature of reality.
Philosophical Consequences
Free Will in a Programmed Reality
If our universe is a simulation, what does that mean for free will? Are we autonomous agents, or lines of code executing predetermined functions?
Some theorists argue that even within a simulation, emergent consciousness and decision-making can still be genuine. After all, artificial intelligence agents in simulated environments can learn, adapt, and act unpredictably.
The Programmer Question
Assuming we live in a simulation, it naturally invites the question: Who or what programmed it?
- A Post-Human Civilization? Advanced beings may be running simulations of ancestral worlds.
- A Universal Intelligence? The simulation could be the work of a higher order intelligence beyond our comprehension.
- Pure Logic? The universe might not require a programmer at all. It may be the inevitable output of mathematical and computational laws.
Conclusion: A Universe with Purposeful Code?
Though we may be far from proving we live in a computer simulation, the evidence keeps mounting that the universe behaves as if it were structured by informational logic. Gravity, rather than being a mysterious pull between bodies, may be the system’s strategy for reducing its own informational overhead.
In this view, the cosmos is not just a physical machine—it’s a calculating engine, sculpting matter and energy not through brute force, but through algorithmic elegance. The second law of infodynamics doesn’t just describe a new principle—it offers a blueprint of the universe’s operating system.
Whether or not we’re living in a simulation, understanding the universe through the lens of information may be the next frontier in both physics and philosophy.
Citations:
- AIP Advances, https://aip.scitation.org/journal/adv
- Shannon, C.E. “A Mathematical Theory of Communication” (1948) — Bell System Technical Journal.
- Verlinde, E. “On the Origin of Gravity and the Laws of Newton” (2011) — https://arxiv.org/abs/1001.0785
- Lloyd, S. “Programming the Universe: A Quantum Computer Scientist Takes On the Cosmos” (2006)
- Bostrom, N. “Are You Living in a Computer Simulation?” (2003) — Philosophical Quarterly.
Related Posts
About the Author: Bernard Aybout (Virii8)
